Sphinx-like Thinking: Photographer Ivan Eberle sees evidence of an ancient sculpture in a Carmel River State Beach rock. “I can make a pretty good photographic case,” he says, “that this is not natural.“

Sphinx-like Thinking: Photographer Ivan Eberle sees evidence of an ancient sculpture in a Carmel River State Beach rock. “I can make a pretty good photographic case,” he says, “that this is not natural.“

On the Hunt

Controversial wildlife photographer tracks potential 
archaeological treasures.

 The rocks at Carmel River State Beach are a bit like cumulus clouds: Lighting, angle and imagination can reveal different pictures in their shapes. 


But Pacific Grove-based wildlife photographer Ivan Eberle thinks one particular hunk of granite is too symmetrical to have been sculpted by wind and waves. He describes it as “Sphinx-like,” and its horned visage—complete with a deep, round eye socket—is uncanny. 


Eberle isn’t an archaeologist, and he knows that without an official State Parks assessment, his Sphinx idea is just a hunch. But he suspects it, and other sites deep in Monterey County’s wilderness, merit closer inspection.


In June, Eberle led a team of archaeologists—Gary Breschini and Trudy Haversat of Salinas-based Archaeological Consulting, and Bob Strickland of Los Padres National Forest—to a cave in the Tassajara area, where he showed them six white paintings consistent with the more numerous hand-print designs documented in another Los Padres cave. Breschini believes those paintings date back to Esselen Indian inhabitation in the late prehistoric era. 


Eberle claims his discovery has gotten the cave into the National Register of Historic Places. But officials with the California Office of Historic Preservation and the National Register have no record of a recent Monterey County prehistoric cave listing. 


“I’m sure it could not have happened,” Strickland says.


Still, Breschini appreciates that Eberle’s photographic forays led to sites meriting archaeological inspection. “We’ve been out there since the ’70s looking at these caves, and [Eberle’s discovery] was in a different direction than where we’d been looking,” he says.


He’s cautious about interpreting the rock on Carmel River State Beach as a prehistoric sculpture, but he confirms the beach contains ancient mortar holes and is adjacent to an Esselen ancestral site dating back nearly 10,000 years.


On Oct. 18 Eberle launched a Kickstarter campaign, soliciting $16,500 in crowd-sourced funding to digitize and print his large-format negatives and continue the field work he claims could unveil more archaeological treasures. 


But as of Nov. 13, two days before the campaign’s close, only $10 had been pledged. In a related comment thread, three posters mock Eberle’s claims. 


They’re not the only skeptics. Keith Vandevere, a Monterey County planning commissioner with an interest in wilderness issues, posted a tongue-in-cheek entry about the Kickstarter bid on his blog Xasáuan Today, writing, “Ivan Eberle recently revealed to the world what could well be the most significant finds ever made in the field of North American pre-history…Exciting stuff!”


Just the mention of Vandevere’s name triggers Eberle’s fury. The two began sparring online in the wake of the 2008 Basin Complex Fire, when Eberle was caretaking the Monterey Institute for Research in Astronomy’s observatory. 


Eberle was charged with interfering with firefighters during the blaze but claimed he was only protecting the observatory. The charges were dropped. 


Commenting on a July 2008 Xasáuan Today post about wildfire management, Vandevere and Eberle locked horns in a prickly debate. Eberle, convinced Vandevere found a way to optimize Xasáuan Today posts in a Google search of his name, still holds a grudge.


“The only secret search engine optimization technique I know is to write about stuff people are interested in reading,” Vandevere responds. 


Still, Breschini says Eberle’s explorations hold real potential for archaeological discovery. “In the process he’s found this one site,” Breschini says, “and to us that’s extremely useful.”

Comments

Interesting, Kera, that you chose to go to print with Strickland's comment-- without taking this federal archaeologist to task for not following through on his official duty to register and protect a Native American rock art site. Indeed, you were in possession of his emails to me containing such assurances well before your deadline. Extremely sloppy journalism on your part--as was was your baldfaced assertion that I claimed we got it into the National Register of Historic Places. The federally-accessible, CA University System database it was to be recorded into, but that you couldn't find, is not publicly accessible, or so I was told by Strickland. But no, it was not the National Register; I made no such claim to you, nor did I ever say so anywhere in my Kickstarter materials.

Breschini? God only knows why he's walking it back now. 6 weeks ago he had been enthusiastically chatting up my find with Tom "Little Bear" Nason. This according to Tom, who congratulated me for getting it protected--and he of all people would be in a position to know.

The pattern of obfuscation here (particularly MoCo Planning Commissioner Keith Vandevere's snick-and-run comments, no longer anonymous, I suppose I should at least thank the Weekly for that) is a familiar theme in Monterey County politics. There is this pernicious kind of protectionism hereabouts, a Scorched-Earth Obstructionism if you will, one that seems to allow ample room for backdoor deals among cohorts and chums. The vicious attack response I've provoked in announcing my simple art project, might lend credence to the longstanding rumor floating around about multiple other ancient cultural sites down in the Tassajara area being deliberately kept out of the MoCo Master Plan in the mid 1980's.

Readers may rest assured that I'll be probing around for more sites, and that the protection issue won't be going away so easily this time.

Sign in to comment