Water Wizardry

Heritage Oaks partner Wayne Holman jokes about raising heritage pigs on the property if he loses in court.

Defending the county before Monterey County Superior Court Judge Kay Kingsley on Sept. 23, Deputy County Counsel Kay Reimann got poetic about North County’s limited water supply.

“If you have the moon and the stars aligned, it should work and there will be a net increase,” she says. “But there were large assumptions.”

Reimann was defending the county’s denial of a proposed 32-lot subdivision on 80 acres of oak-studded hills in Aromas, named for the trees it would build around: Heritage Oaks.

But it’s not the trees at issue here, it’s water. The would-be developers contend a recharge system would result in a net increase for the water table. Opponents, including land-use watchdogs Aromas Citizens for Planned Growth and LandWatch Monterey County, say that’s not true—unless Reimann’s cosmic alignment produces just the right combination of predicted rainfall and percolation.

The County Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors each ultimately sided with the water skeptics and denied the project. (After the Planning Commission denial in 2009, the developers appealed to the Board of Supervisors, where they lost again in 2010.)

Now Kingsley will interpret how the project would impact the aquifer—and whether the county was justified in rejecting it. Her decision is due Dec. 23.

“Your argument is that the county disregarded the experts.”

Los Gatos-based attorney John Shepardson laid out Heritage Oaks’ argument, claiming the supervisors misread the water reports completed as part of the environmental impact report.

“The project should’ve been approved,” Shepardson said in court. “It can’t be based on speculation or a guess.”

Kingsley hinted she was leaning toward the county’s side. “It seems as though your argument is that the county disregarded all the experts,” she said, “but a lot of the experts did characterize their support as ‘if this, if that.’”

What makes this case particularly interesting is that the county will find itself arguing the opposite side—in favor of approving a development—in a lawsuit by the Highway 68 Coalition over a planned Corral de Tierra shopping center, where a similar water recharge system helped get the project approved on appeal.

The developers, sisters Marcella Zobel and Star Mallory, with contractor Wayne Holman (also an Aromas Water District board member), proposed the subdivision in 1999. They spent $360,000 over 10 years on the environmental impact report.

What happened during that decade, from the time they first began the application process to the project denial, is also an issue in this lawsuit. The developers say it wasn’t until well after they began preparing environmental documents that the county acknowledged the overdraft, and the project should be approved based on 1999 standards.

In a 2005 letter to Holman, County Planning and Building Services Manager Ann Towner wrote, “There might not be a long-term sustainable use of water for the Heritage Oaks subdivision.”

Zobel says the opposition caught her off guard. “We’re local people, we’re not foreign developers,” she says. “We’re continually puzzled. We thought we were benefitting the community.”

Recommended for you

(2) comments

cbsnews

"Bring on the pigs"? Mr Holman, is that your intention as revenge? This would be the kind of response I'd expect from someone who could give a pig's crap about the incredible and beautiful land under scrutiny. In other words, if YOU can't make money, the property is as much as PIG CRAP to you and the owners. Is that accurate?

cbsnews

There's no "speculation or guessing". These developers purchased an attorney who will attempt to lead the community--and a judge-- to believe the North Monterey County water supply is not under stress from overdraft, contrary to what the locals (and the county) know. The develops hired their own 'experts',presumably at great cost, to make some illogical argument that winter recharge would replenish the NMC aquifer they want to pump from. Fortunately, the County reviewed this highly paid bogus analysis and determined it was completely irrational hydrology, based on current reality. Aromas does not want this local developer,who has $360,000 in the game, claiming they are filing this law suit in the sake of "benifiting the Aromas community". THEY ARE FILING TO MAKE $ and at the expense of a dwindling water supply meant to last for generations. We know. We hope the judge knows.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.