It is obvious that there is not any cannabis horticulture classes at either school. The author made it quite clear that those ideas are what the subjects of the article envision for the future. In fact, the next sentence speaks in a future tense about opening a dispensary. I don't understand how people could be confused unless they stop reading halfway through the second paragraph.
Either way, we should be discussing the merits of the ideas espoused in the article, not grammatical issues that a minority may become confused by. I think this author did an amazing job at showing the hypocrisy of the ban of a taxable business in Marina.
This hypocrisy is also evident when our Chief of Police is talking about enforcing federal laws regarding medicalmarijuana. This is because federal laws should be enforced by the executive branch of the federal government. If that was not the case, we should also be rounding up illegal immigrants and spending money we don't have enforcing other federal laws. This is clearly political cherry picking by our local elected public servants.
In the end, this article shows the hypocrisy of a state government that won't even follow the will of its own people that was legally conveyed via public referendum almost 2 decades ago. These politicians and police make statements that make them seem like they believe they are not servants of the people, rather servants of their own political future. Let us have a good, friendly debate on the actual issues. Hopefully then, we can establish once again what the people want.
It is obvious that there is not any cannabis horticulture classes at either school. The author made it quite clear that those ideas are what they envision for the future. In fact, the next sentence speaks in a future tense about opening a dispensary. I don't understand how people could be confused unless they stop reading halfway through the second paragraph.
Either way, we should be discussing the merits of the ideas espoused in the article, not grammatical issues that a minority may become confused by.
I think this author did an amazing job at showing the hypocrisy of the ban in Marina. In addition, the police chief is talking about enforcing federal laws regarding marijuana. However, federal laws should be enforced by the executive branch of the federal government. If that was not the case, we should also be rounding up illegal immigrants and spending money we don't have enforcing other federal laws. This is clearly political cherry picking.
In the end, this article shows the hypocrisy of a state government that won't even follow the will of its own people that was properly conveyed via public referendum almost 2 decades ago.
Let us have a good, friendly debate on the actual issues.
Good day,
David
True Believers
It is obvious that there is not any cannabis horticulture classes at either school. The author made it quite clear that those ideas are what the subjects of the article envision for the future. In fact, the next sentence speaks in a future tense about opening a dispensary. I don't understand how people could be confused unless they stop reading halfway through the second paragraph. Either way, we should be discussing the merits of the ideas espoused in the article, not grammatical issues that a minority may become confused by. I think this author did an amazing job at showing the hypocrisy of the ban of a taxable business in Marina. This hypocrisy is also evident when our Chief of Police is talking about enforcing federal laws regarding medicalmarijuana. This is because federal laws should be enforced by the executive branch of the federal government. If that was not the case, we should also be rounding up illegal immigrants and spending money we don't have enforcing other federal laws. This is clearly political cherry picking by our local elected public servants. In the end, this article shows the hypocrisy of a state government that won't even follow the will of its own people that was legally conveyed via public referendum almost 2 decades ago. These politicians and police make statements that make them seem like they believe they are not servants of the people, rather servants of their own political future. Let us have a good, friendly debate on the actual issues. Hopefully then, we can establish once again what the people want.
Good day, David
Davy
It is obvious that there is not any cannabis horticulture classes at either school. The author made it quite clear that those ideas are what they envision for the future. In fact, the next sentence speaks in a future tense about opening a dispensary. I don't understand how people could be confused unless they stop reading halfway through the second paragraph. Either way, we should be discussing the merits of the ideas espoused in the article, not grammatical issues that a minority may become confused by. I think this author did an amazing job at showing the hypocrisy of the ban in Marina. In addition, the police chief is talking about enforcing federal laws regarding marijuana. However, federal laws should be enforced by the executive branch of the federal government. If that was not the case, we should also be rounding up illegal immigrants and spending money we don't have enforcing other federal laws. This is clearly political cherry picking. In the end, this article shows the hypocrisy of a state government that won't even follow the will of its own people that was properly conveyed via public referendum almost 2 decades ago. Let us have a good, friendly debate on the actual issues. Good day, David