Monterey City Council

The case for building more housing in Monterey is bolstered by a simple fact: state law requires it. By 2023, the city must increase its housing stock by 650 units. Considering the real estate market and the kind of money folks are shelling for rent or ownership in Monterey, it might seem like an easy goal. But it’s not, for several reasons.

One problem is that the State Water Resources Control Board has imposed a moratorium on new water service connections in the area. To build, a developer must obtain the rights to a preexisting connection. The other challenge is land. Only certain parts of the city are zoned for residential use. Then, there’s the political problem. Any real estate project has to attract enough support in order to overcome inevitable criticism and opposition.

On June 4, a major proposal for new housing faced a critical test at Monterey City Council and emerged successfully. By a 4-1 vote, council members approved a change to city code that would allow a private developer to apply to build up to 405 new apartments on the south side of Garden Road. 

The change involves the rezoning of an area that was previously designated for offices and light industrial use only. The developers, Keith and Jannette Slama, are proposing to convert existing buildings—which already have water connections—into multifamily residential developments. 

As part of the decision, the city is requiring that 20 percent of residential units in the Garden Road developments be reserved for affordable housing.

By approving the change, City Council overturned an April 23 ruling by the city Planning Commission, which voted 3-3 on the rezoning request, effectively denying it.

Among the supporters of the rezoning were the Monterey Peninsula Chamber of Commerce and the Monterey Bay Economic Partnership.

The citizen’s group LandWatch backed the proposal saying it promotes infill development.

“Rezoning Garden Road helps the city achieve its housing goals while avoiding sprawl onto the natural lands on the former Fort Ord,” the group’s executive director, Mike DeLapa, said at the council hearing.

“Integrating residential and industrial uses is more sustainable and climate-friendly than either industrial or residential zoning alone because it gets people closer to jobs, out of their cars, and on their feet and bicycles,” he added.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

  • - Opinionated insiders news
  • - Foodie news
  • - Events calendar
  • - E-edition and comics
Your email is never shared.

Asaf Shalev is a staff writer at the Monterey County Weekly. He covers higher education, the military, the environment, public lands and the geographic areas of Seaside, Monterey, Sand City, Big Sur and Carmel Valley.

Become a Member Today

YOU ENJOY READING US. LET’S KEEP IT THAT WAY.
PLEASE HELP KEEP YOUR INDEPENDENT MEDIA HERE FOR GOOD.

It takes a huge effort for Monterey County Weekly to stay independent and deliver the quality news, arts & entertainment you’ve come to depend on. We’re inviting our readers to join our new membership program, a new way to support independent, local media.

Learn more.

Recommended for you

(1) comment

Jeffrey Weekley

The vast majority of new housing on the peninsula will happen in Marina (nearly 4000 planned houses/apartments). Other cities need to do their part in providing work force and affordable housing, especially in areas not requiring car travel on the already overburdened Highway 1. I can’t believe Monterey’s planning commission deadlocked on this.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.