Embattled council debates semantics as city administrator remains on the job.

Behind Closed Doors: A city employee says Carmel City Administrator Rich Guillen, above, sexually harassed her. The city settled the lawsuit, and six months later, Guillen’s still got a job.

Sparks flew in Carmel at its Feb. 1 council meeting as a debate over the city’s compliance with California’s open meetings law continues to rage. 


On the morning of the meeting, City Councilman Jason Burnett announced that the council’s agenda would include a report from a September closed session at which the council appears to have voted on the fate of embattled City Administrator Rich Guillen. 


A few hours later, City Attorney Don Freeman changed his mind and declared there would be no announcement. 


Former City Councilman Mike Brown told the council that Carmelites are asking, “What the hell is going on in Carmel?” given that Guillen remains in office, six months after the city paid its former Human Resources Manager Jane Miller more than $600,000 to settle a lawsuit alleging that Guillen barraged her with endearment-filled emails and eliminated her job when she failed to respond to his advances. 


Under the Brown Act, city council members must discuss personnel matters in closed session, but they’re required to report the results of any votes taken behind closed doors unless a matter is still pending. “I don’t believe final action was taken,” Freeman said.


“I believe it is final action,” responded City Councilman Jason Burnett. “But if not, why was the most recent request (for an additional closed session meeting to discuss the Guillen matter) rejected on the grounds we have nothing to discuss?” 


The Weekly is powered by the generosity of readers like you, who support our mission to produce engaging, independent and in-depth journalism.

Show Your Support
Learn More

Burnett demanded a direct answer from Freeman, but didn’t get one. He moved that a closed session meeting be scheduled that week. City Councilman Ken Talmage seconded the motion, but it failed 3-2. 


Burnett reports that the city is attempting to schedule a closed session later this month.

Become a Weekly Insider.

Join Us
Learn More

Recommended for you

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.